Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Attachment 41 Laboratory Instructor Evaluation
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 



DOE-HDBK-1078-94
This rating scale provides an example of how a laboratory session could be evaluated. The
Mastery, Satisfactory, and Unsatisfactory ratings provide a three-part rating scale.
Date:
/
/
INSTRUCTOR:
EVALUATOR:
Name:
Name:
Title:
Title:
Course Name:
Course Number:
Control Number:
EVALUATION:
Announced:
Unannounced:
Start Time:
Stop Time:
Instructions--The instructional evaluation form is divided into five parts. Each statement
should be rated.
EXPLANATION OF RATINGS
M
=
Mastery
--
Instructor exhibited and consistently applied the
stated characteristic.
S
=
Satisfactory
--
Instructor exhibited the stated characteristic.
U
=
Unsatisfactory
--
Instructor did not exhibit the stated characteristics.
NA =
Not Applicable
--
Not relevant to this observation.
N/O =
Not Able to Observe
--
Evaluator not present when it should have occurred.
Ratings
General Instructional Techniques
(circle one)
Notes
1.
Objectives for the laboratory were:
a.
Stated prior to performance.
M S U NA N/O
b.
Discussed prior to performance.
M S U NA N/O
182


Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business