|
| DOE-HDBK-3027-99
of the review. Two weeks, outside of the normal review activities, were scheduled to review
operations to assist in the preparation of a recommendation to the Approval Authority concerning
Phase II activities at eleven identified priority facilities.
a. Week One/Initial Site Orientation and Team Preparations . An initial three day site visit
was used to train the team, to explain the verification methodology, and to develop the
CRADs to be used for the review. The Team Leader presented a "straw man" as a starting
point for the team. This pre-visit was also an opportunity for the team to meet the WSRC
management personnel responsible for developing the Description. The ISMS Executive
Course, developed at DOE Headquarters, was presented for the team training.
b. Week Two/ISMS Briefings and Final Preparations. A second one week period at the site
was scheduled to permit the WSRC and DOE-SR management to present an overview of the
Plan to the team. WSRC presented three and one-half days of briefings on topics relating to
the manner in which the five safety functions were addressed in the WSRC ISMS Description
and provided two facility examples of the implementation strategy. DOE-SR personnel
presented a half day session on topics germane to the DOE oversight of ISMS programs. An
outline of the schedule used for these briefings is included at the end of the Phase I Lessons
Learned. Following the four days of briefings, team members developed a list of personnel to
be interviewed and records to be reviewed. This process was effective in preparing the team
and the WSRC and DOE-SR personnel and in establishing the expectations for the review.
The following lessons learned are pertinent to the team briefing and final preparations:
C The briefings by the contractor provide the verification team members with
information concerning the processes in place and should be made a part of every
verification effort. These briefings should be comprehensive to convince the team that
the ISMS is well understood and the efforts are integrated. (See "Content of the
Presentation" below.)
C Good communications between the team and the contractor and DOE are required so
that the presentations provide information useful to the team.
C Briefings provided for review should include information on the site's organization,
points of contact, and pertinent programs and documents.
C Guidance from the Team Leader should be provided sufficiently well in advance of the
briefings to ensure the content and format of this material is correct. See paragraph
4.b. (1) below for suggested guidance regarding content of the briefings.
C Allow sufficient time between the briefing, final preparations phase, and
commencement of the review process to permit the contractor to make all the
necessary preparations such as developing the interview schedule, assembling
documents for the team, and briefing site personnel on expectations. The one week
period allowed in this review was not sufficient. A two-week interval for this effort
would provide enough time for the contractor to develop the schedule and submit it to
the Team Leader for approval prior to the team arriving on site.
A-5-5
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |